Blog
March 30, 2016

Does Fly Control Bug You?
No Comments / in Loomix / by Loomix

by Dr.Kelley Neuhold, Loomix Technical Service Specialist

I am a 4th generation SE Colorado rancher, at the age of twelve I took the money I had saved and purchased two bred cows. Those two baldy cows were the start of my current cow herd. From that time forward my dad and I have run cows together and one of the common conversations we have each year is should we feed fly control. Two of our common concerns are does feed thru fly control work and is it cost effective.

We make a common mistake many producers make, which is starting to feed fly control too late. Dad and I don’t start thinking about fly control until we see flies which is about 30 to 60 days too late. Oral fly control should start being fed 30 days before the last hard freeze. In the continental U.S. start dates range from March 1st in the south to May 15th in the north. If a fly population is established prior to feeding fly control it will take 35 days to see a reduction in fly numbers. A pour-on, spray, or rub could be used in those situations to help decrease the adult fly population.
In my experience many producers mistake fly control for fly eradication, thus their disappointment with their control program. Fly eradication is nearly impossible to accomplish and never cost effective. Two hundred flies per animal is the economic threshold, if the fly population exceeds this threshold production and/or economic losses will occur. Table 1 demonstrates this point very well. Campbell (1976) evaluated the effect of fly control (treated cows 15 flies per cow vs untreated cows 469 flies per cow) on steer weaning weights in the sand hills of Nebraska. Under the conditions of this study fly control increase weaning weights 13 lb at $1.60 per pound that would mean an extra $20.80 per steer weaned. They did not report body condition scores of the cows but I would assume similar if not better body condition for the treated cows.

A three year study conducted in Louisiana evaluated the effect of fly control on replacement heifer performance (Table 2). Pregnancy rates were not different between the two groups, however replacement heifers treated for horn flies gained 15 pound more than heifers not treated over the 140 day feeding period. The greatest gains were realized in heifers that remained open. Open heifers treated for flies gained 0.25 lb/hd/d more than open heifers that were not treated for flies. This makes treated heifers 35 lb heavier over 140 feeding period, at $1.37 per pound, those heifers are $48 more valuable at sale time. This helps offset some of the cost associated with developing an open heifer.

Horn flies are the most economically relevant fly to the cattle industry, this is especially true for pasture cattle. Confinement operations may need to control other types of flies as well as horn flies. Face flies can also have an impact on your bottom line through the spread of disease such as pink eye. Houston (2010) estimated that pinkeye cost producers $150 million annually. Make sure the product you use is labeled for the fly or flies that are on your cattle. One benefit of oral fly control is that there is no need to rotate products, once you find one that works for you, you can stay with it.

To have a successful fly season remember these three keys. First start thinking about fly control before you have flies, don’t be like my dad and I. Second remember it is fly control, some flies are acceptable. Realist fly control reduces the population by 75 to 80%. And finally keeping fly population below 200 flies per animal can add pounds to your cattle and dollars to your bottom line.

Table 1. Effect of treating beef cows
for horn flies on steer weaning weights.1

Item

Treated

Untreated

Weaning weight, lb

387a

374b

Horn flies per cow

15

469

1Adapted from Campbell 1976.

2Means with in a row with different superscripts differ
(P < 0.05).

 

 

Table 2. Effect of horn fly treatment
on replacement heifer performance.1

Item

Treated

Untreated

SEM

P<

Initial weight, lb

781

778

5.5

0.71

Final weight, lb

906

891

6.0

0.01

ADG, lb

0.91

0.82

0.022

0.001

Total gain, lb

128

113

3.1

0.001

Pregnancy Rates, %

75

78

2.8

0.46

ADG Bred, lb

0.89

0.83

0.022

0.004

ADG open, lb

0.98

0.73

0.066

0.002

Campbell, J. B. 1976. Effect of Horn Fly Control on Cows as Expressed by Increased Weaning Weights of Calves. Journal of Economic Entomology. 69:711-712(2).
DeRouen, S. M., L. D. Foil, A. J. MacKay, D. E. Franke, D. W. Sanson, and W. E. Wyatt. 2003. Effect of horn fly (Haematobia irritans) control on growth and reproduction of beef heifer. Journal of Economic Entomology. 96:1612-1616.
Huston, C. 2010.Pinkeye in Cattle. (Publication 2608) Extension Service of Mississippi State University.

From the Loomix® Doctor’s Office

by Dr. Kelley Neuhold, Loomix Technical Service Specialist

As I sat down to write this article, I was reminded of a sign that hung above the door in the sale barn café. It said “Cows may come and cows may go, but the bull in this place is forever.” Unfortunately, actual bulls won’t last forever but their useful life can sure be reduced with improper management and nutrition. Many times bull management is overlooked because they only make up 2.5 to 5 percent of a herd; however, keep in mind they contribute to 50 percent of the reproduction equation. Fertility problems in bulls can have a major impact on a ranch’s bottom line by lengthening the calving season, reducing calving percentages, and the cost of feeding open cows. Fertility is influenced by both the animal’s genetics and environment. Environmental factors include nutrition, health and management. Once a bull is born nothing can be done to improve his genes, but nutrition and management can be used to increase his breeding longevity.

Feeding and caring for mature bulls, older than 3 years, in good body condition (BC) is much like feeding and caring for dry cows in the second trimester of pregnancy (Table 1). A good BC score for a bull is similar to that of a cow. Prior to and during breeding season bulls should have a BC between 5.5 and 6.5 (Walker et al. 2008). Extremely thin and extremely fat bulls can have semen quality and libido issues for different reasons. Bulls should always have plenty of fresh water, a warm dry place to lie down (bedding maybe needed during extreme cold weather), room to exercise and full access to low to medium quality forage (6 to7 percent CP). Young bulls, younger than 3 years, need more consideration than mature bulls. These bulls are still developing and are more likely to be timid. Young bulls have higher protein and energy requirements (Table 1) than mature bulls due to their growth requirement.

Vitamins and trace minerals (TM) play a very important role in male reproduction. Manganese deficiency is associated with reduced male libido. Zinc (Zn) and vitamin A deficiencies are related to a reduction in spermatogenesis (Bearden and Fuquay, 1992). NRC (2000) suggests vitamin and TM requirements are similar for bulls and cows (Vitamin A = 1,275; Zn = 30 ppm). Arthington et al. (1995) used yearling bulls to evaluate Zn concentration and source on fertility. The three treatments were 1) 40 ppm from Zn sulfate, 2) 40 ppm 1/3 organic Zn 2/3 Zn sulfate, 3) 60 ppm Zn sulfate. They found across all fertility measurement evaluated bull on treatment number two had the most favorable results followed by treatment number three than treatment number one, suggesting that 30 ppm Zn suggested by the NRC maybe too low for yearling bulls. Rowe et al. (2011) used mature bulls to evaluate TM source (organic vs. inorganic) on semen quality and found bulls who were fed organic TM had improved semen quality (Table 2) over bulls fed the same concentration of inorganic TM. These experiments suggest providing bulls a portion of their TM from organic source may improve semen quality, which may improve conception rate in the herd.

Management of bulls should not be overlooked, it can mean the difference between being profitable and not. Keep in mind it takes about 60 days to produce mature sperm; therefore, it will take at least 60 days before management

changes will be realized. This emphasized the importance of evaluating BC and rations 90 days prior to breeding to give time for any change to take effect. The best advice I can give is to preform breeding soundness exams each year on your bulls. This is very cheap insurance, especially for producers who have single bull pastures.

Table 1. Nutrient requirement for young and mature bulls (Dry matter basis).1

Weight, lb

ADG, lbs

CP, %

TDN, %

Zinc, ppm2

Vitamin A, IU/lb

1,100

1

10.1

55.0

40

1,275

2,000

0

6.5

45.9

40

1,275

1Based on NRC 2000. 2NRC suggest zinc

level at 30 ppm, however research presented would suggest a minimum

of 40 ppm.

Table 2. LS Mean sperm measurements of bulls assigned to inorganic or organic trace mineral treatments over the 9 week study.1
Sperm Parameters

Inorganic

Organic2

P values

Motile, %

56.1 ± 2.8

65.5 ± 2.6

0.024

Progressive, %

38.4 ± 2.2

47.0 ± 2.0

0.011

Rapid, %

52.8 ± 2.9

62.3 ± 2.6

0.027

1Adopted from Rowe et al. 2011. 2Organic trace minerals were provided

from Zinpro Availa4.

Sources’

Arthington, J., K. Johnson, L. Corah, C. Williams, and D. Hill. 1995. The effect of dietary zinc level and source on yearling

bull growth and fertility. J. Anim. Sci. Abstract.

Bearden, H. J., and J. W. Fuquay. 1992. Nutritional management. In: Applied Animal Reproduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 283-292.

NRC. 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. Seventh Revised Edition. National Academy Press. Washington, DC.

Rowe, M. P., J. G. Powell, E. B. Kegley, T. D. Lester,

C. L. Williams, R. J. Page, and R. W. Rorie. 2011. Influence of organic versus inorganic trace mineral supplementation on bull semen quality. Univ. of Arkansas Systems Div. of Ag., Dept. of Anim. Sci., Fayetteville, Ark. AAES Research Series 597.

Walker, J., G. Perry, and

K. Olson. 2008. Bull Nutrition. SDSU Extension Extra Anim. and Range Sci. ExEx2065.

Dr. Kelley Neuhold can be reached at Kelley.Neuhold@allianceliquidfeeds.com.